Question:
Originally Posted by Indiscreet Yes, those are quite funky.
These are the kind of shoes I abhor. Yuck. Oh god! My eyes! I'm blind ....
PS: Big difference between those and the Ferragamo Gancinis i showed earlier. I'm sure you can see it.
PPS: Speaking of Ferragamo, Salvatore and James have invited me to Florence (well, not only me, haha!) ... should i go and get my picture taken in front of David, whaddaya think?

Answer:
I'm about to buy a couple pairs of Johnston & Murphy's, they're basically the cheap version of AE's. Most of their shoe designs look to be copied from AE. By cheap, I mean $100 cheaper, as in $200 still. Tomorrow I snag a pair, hopefully.
- Rich

Answer:
Yes, they're very different.
80s shoes... *shudders*

Answer:
Originally Posted by CoTHukoB
Of course, sneakers for me are something one wears to the gym. An everyday 'sneaker' might be something like this:
We call these 'cockroach killers' -- women have a similar style of extreme pointed toes, which we can use to corner cockroaches and effectively stomp on them.

Answer:
Ah, the 80s ... i couldn't afford shoes back then. Walked to school barefoot, in the snow, uphill both ways!
Aye, i'm familiar with the "killers", have gone through several pairs of cowboy boots ... still have a pair somewhere with a half inch of dust on 'em, they'd just make me look like an aging hipster, haha!

Answer:
Originally Posted by Indiscreet Yes, those are quite funky.
These are the kind of shoes I abhor. Yuck. EWWWWWWWWWWWW