Question:
is being a free-kick specialist necessary a good player? or is he just good in his looks not in his boots...

Answer:

is being a free-kick specialist necessary a good player? or is he just good in his looks not in his boots...

Answer:

i juz know tt beckham is a ang gong siao player.. almost every part of his body have ang gong..
but he have nice free kick skill..

Answer:

he is a lousy player. can take free kick, can cross, but that's all he can do.
cannot run fast, cannot tackle, cannot head, cannot dribble, no ball skills, cannot mark properly...

Answer:

erm but he did have skill; which learnt from the likes of zidance; figo; ronaldo from real madrid. i did see him improving; no one can denied his set piece technique; how many wonderful goal has he score?

Answer:

overated player.He can only cross/take free kicks.He's a Galacticos not bcoZ of his skill,it bcoz he is famous. Real buy him to sell Jerseys n break into the Asian Markets.

Answer:

JOGGER IN THE PARK !~!~!~!!
what do we do w a hardworking midfielder who can run but cant clean up like keane or viera or makelele..
what do we do w we hv a player tt can only stand there and take kick ?
beckham is useless..
no doubt his best asset is his long pass and free kick..
in spain like nou camp where the field is bigger he can exploit the length of the pitch.. but in small pitches like highbury, his long passing might not be tt effective..
he cant dribble, cant tackle wads the use?

Answer:

well players has to provide quality and good crossing services for the strikers to score...
If the quality of the crossing sucks, the striker can suck thumb liaoz...

Answer:

problem is, in open play he can only cross

Answer:

i also tink that he is lousy.. cant run n dribble n tackle
however he is useful n kinda important to a team bcos his freekick can turn things around.. he just need to score a goal from the set piece n thats just want the team requiremnt of him.. as for the rest of the 90mins, he can blxxdy hell just run around like a fool, stop holding on to the ball n give the ball away.

Answer:

did anyone realised that man utd crashed after selling beckham
his distribution of the ball was sorely missed

Answer:


cristiano ronaldo was a good replacement.

Answer:


Ronaldinho is supposed to be Beckham replacement. See...WHo doing so well now? Ronaldinho cant cross as well..But he can pass those defence spliting pass n score goals,take free kicks.. Defend attack n so on..Beckham can only cross n take decent free kicks. Anyway..C.Ronal;do is a great replacement..Give the boy a 2-3 years n he might become the next Luis Figo.

Answer:

he can deliver good passes in da past.. nowadays, not really..

Answer:


because man utd was too used to playing that predictable 1 dimensional style that's reliant on beckham's crosses. that doesn't mean he is a good player, just that he fits into the team's style.

Answer:

Beckham is Gd for selling Jerseys..Nothing else..Retire n head to Hollywood.Hmm..Anyway he's only Gd when he don the 3 Lions Jersey..Other than tat.. HE cant play well..

Answer:

he is lousy even when playing for england. worse than when he was playing for man utd.

Answer:

Someone once said "Gazza can dribble to the front of the penalty box and deliver a defence splitting pass to the striker. Beckham can accurately delivers a goal scoring chance by simply kicking the ball from 30 yards out."

Answer:

Poison: Ok lets say Becks is more HArdworking when he plays for England.
R h y t h m: But his passing acurracy is no doubt very gd but how many times can he do those trademarks cross these days? He looks like a Fool running around.Golden Balls.lolx.. former Brazil manager Vanderlei Luxemburgo will bench him.(New REal Coach)

Answer:

hardworking? it doesn't take much effort to be "hardworking" when all you do is jog slowly up or down the right flank.

Answer:


Just compare the times he when he played for England n the times he played for REAL u can tell the diffrence.